How Our Current Administration Loves Phthalates

Frank Bailey
Attorney
(866) 735-1102 Ext 435
Visit Frank Bailey on Avvo
Posted by Frank BaileyDecember 15, 2008 5:16 PM

According to a lawsuit filed by the Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., and Public Citizen, Inc. against the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (“CPSC”), chemicals known as phthalates are used to soften plastics in children’s toys and other common consumer products. These chemicals are known to interfere with production of the hormone testosterone and have been associated with reproductive abnormalities. Numerous studies have linked exposure to certain phthalates with decreases in testosterone, malformations of the genitalia, and reduced sperm production, among other adverse effects.

In the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, enacted on August 14, 2008, Congress permanently banned the manufacture, sale, distribution, and import of all child care articles and children’s toys containing more than 0.1 percent of any of three different phthalates.

The General Counsel for the CPSC now has given the opinion that the ban does not apply to any toy or child care product manufactured before the effective date of February 10, 2009. This decision by the CPSC authorizes sale of banned children’s products after the statute’s effective date, despite Congress’s clear prohibition on any sale after that date.

The basic purpose of the CPSA is to ensure consumer protection. It appears this purpose has been thwarted.

In a letter dated November 13, 2008, on behalf of unnamed clients, counsel at the law firm Arent Fox LLP , Georgia C. Ravitz and Scott A. Cohn, asked the CPSC to “consider not applying the phthalates restrictions retroactively to inventory as of February 10, 2009.

Amazingly, in a decision published two business days later, on November 17, 2008, the CPSC General Counsel agreed.

By permitting sale of banned products after the date of the statutory ban, the General Counsel has contradicted Congress’s clear intent.

In reliance on this decision, manufacturers of children’s toys and child care articles may continue to manufacture and stockpile products containing the restricted phthalates now and sell them long after the ban on sale goes into effect in February.

This is yet another example of how the Bush administration is looking after Corporate America at the expense of our children's safety.

I urge you to contact your representatives and ask them to join Senator Barbara Boxer and Senator Dianne Feinstein along with Representatives Henry A. Waxman and Jan Schakowsky in forcing the CPSC to withdraw this decision.

6 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Bella
Posted by Bella
December 15, 2008 5:17 PM

Wow, eleven links!!! Impressive

Eric H
Posted by Eric H
December 15, 2008 8:19 PM

You do realize that the person who made that ruling, Cheryl Falvey, made another ruling that said that the lead restrictions were retroactive? And that Ms. Falvey is a staunch supporter of Hillary Clinton? Put away your partisan rhetoric and read her decision and the law.

By the way, it is not a matter of manufacturing. There is also a matter of testing and documenting. But you will never discover that in a Public Citizen, PIRG, or NRDC press release.

Abby
Posted by Abby
December 15, 2008 8:44 PM

Eric H must work for the Chamber of Commerce

Eric H
Posted by Eric H
December 15, 2008 9:10 PM

No, Eric doesn't. Abby should get past ad hominem arguments.

Abby
Posted by Abby
December 16, 2008 10:20 AM

In mammals, exposure to antiandrogenic chemicals during sexual differentiation can produce malformations of the reproductive tract. Perinatal administration of AR antagonists like vinclozolin and procymidone or chemicals like di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) that inhibit fetal testicular testosterone production demasculinize the males such that they display reduced anogenital distance (AGD), retained nipples, cleft phallus with hypospadias, undescended testes, a vaginal pouch, epididymal agenesis, and small to absent sex accessory glands as adults.
Gray LE Jr, Ostby J, Furr J, Price M, Veeramachaneni DN, Parks L. Perinatal exposure to the phthalates DEHP, BBP, and INP, but not DEP, DMP, or DOTP, alters sexual differentiation of the male rat. Toxicol Sci. 2000;58 (2):350 –365

Kathleen
Posted by Kathleen
December 16, 2008 2:27 PM

In the interests of intellectual integrity, Abby has abandoned ad hominem arguments and discovered google along with ctrl+c and ctrl+v. Yeah! Pardon my sarcasm but this matter requires grave consideration beyond what's been demonstrated here.

We do not quarrel with safety standards; to whit most of my manufacturers exceed those minimal standards. One pivotal issue is the process of compliance, meaning CPSC accredited third party labs. Assuming there *was* equilibrium in the market btwn supply and demand, a multi-thousandfold increase in the demand for services have caused prices to go so high that telescopes are the most recent example of products that won't be sold to schools next year. The largest manufacturer of microscope lightbulbs has pulled their product from the market due to a tiny and necessary dot of lead solder on the bottom of the bulb.

This is the thing whether you chose to believe it or not. Consumers are not going to have the range of choices they are accustomed to come Feb. By August, people are going to have a very hard and expensive time buying things like car seats, clothes, shoes, school supplies, books etc. This is not about toys but all products children are exposed to in their environment. So go ahead and be giddy, glory in what you perceive to be your victory. You won't be as happy come next fall.

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Bentonville

InjuryBoard Bentonville  RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Bentonville is brought to you by Bailey & Oliver Law Firm

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Bailey & Oliver Law Firm (866) 735-1102 Ext 435 www.imaginejustice.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Bentonville, Fayetteville, Mountain Home, Little Rock, Fort Smith, El Dorado, Bald Knob, Beebe, Benton, Bryant, Cabot, Conway, Dumas, Heber Springs, Hot Springs, Jacksonville, Pine Bluff, Sherwood, all areas of Arkansas.
2000 SE 14th Street, Bentonville, Arkansas 72712 [ Show Map ]506 Hospital Drive, Mountain Home, Arkansas 72653 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address